Log in to your Recall account to give feedback

Feature Requests

Update an Existing Card / Resync with Source
I'm kind of thinking of, so if I have a resource, let's say I saved a resource to something and it's a website or something like that, and then the website was updated. If there was an ability to have it re-sync with it, so we could, and even if you have version history for that card, so I can go back to a card and have it re-sync and it updates that card and then it has different information about it and it's able to compare the two and see what changed and see if there's any corrections, was there any redactions, et cetera. And then I think there's also an extenuation of that. If I add sources in, being able to have Recall go and fact-check that specific source to see if there's been any changes in that source. Is that source no longer valid anymore? Was there any redactions on that source? If it's like a white paper, for example, that might be useful if the white paper was peer-reviewed and there's some changes or updates and then there's a newer version of it. Can we just re-sync it with the newer version? Still have access to the older version. But if I go back to that page, for example, and I go to add it back in there, sometimes if the page isn't uploaded or updated, but they swapped out something, it will I have to delete the card and re-add the new card in for it to see it. So it would be cool to have it re-sync or for example, let's say I know there's like a tech release, Anthropic releases a new update on a model or something like that and I save a card there so I can reference the details on that model or whatnot. Being able to have it re-sync or re-update that same card. Let's say they added some more details in it or they redacted or even have a check. Say, hey, has anything on this page changed since the last time we looked or something like that? Then I would go look, scan the current page, compare against the page that it saved, and it would give me a yes or a no or we need to update this or whatnot. And then there's the kind of option to see if just the ability to update an existing card and not have to delete it and add a completely new card in.
0
·
Recall Knowledge Base
Research Workspace: Projects, Planning, and AI-Assisted Research
I use Recall as my primary knowledge base and have thousands of saved cards. It's great for capture, but when I need to actually do something with what I've saved — write a research paper, a blog post, build a design brief — I end up routing the work through three or four other tools because Recall has no dedicated space for focused project work. What I'd love is a Project — a named container I can create for a specific research effort, import relevant cards from my KB into, and work from. The key thing is that the project scopes the experience: when I chat, explore connections, or view the graph within a project, it works from those cards only — not my entire KB. On top of that, it would be helpful to have a couple of research-specific tools inside the project: A planning space where I can define my thesis, research questions, and what kind of output I'm building toward (academic paper vs. blog post vs. personal reference). Ideally, the AI helps me think through this. Some kind of source health view that tells me things like: how old is my research on average, am I over-indexed on one source type (e.g., lots of podcasts, no white papers), and where are my gaps by topic. My current workaround: I build my research plan in Claude, have Claude query Recall on my behalf, manually curate cards, copy everything into Notion, organized by sub-question, do supplementary research in NotebookLM, and nothing flows back to Recall. It works, but it's fragmented — and Recall, which holds most of my raw material, ends up being the one tool I'm not actually working inside. I think this would make Recall the natural home for research work, not just research capture.
0
·
Recall Knowledge Base
Load More