M
MikeG
It would be nice if Recall could detect and warn if you try to create a new card for a URL that's already been saved.
The title and description of this topic seems to suggest the issue has already been addressed. Yet, for me Recall will still save duplicates with no warning.
Listening to material while multitasking (for example, a long video on YouTube), it's very easy to lose track of whether you already saved it or not. Or, in the case of duplicates in the attached screenshot, I was trying to add content from within the browser version of Recall. It didn't appear to work—even after waiting a minute or two to give Recall time to generate summaries. So, I tried twice more. Finally, I decided to refresh the page and viola, three cards appeared!
From the other comments here, it sounds like this topic may be a fix specifically for combining concise and detailed summaries in the same card instead of creating a separate card for each. Or, for a scenario where the source has a different title for the same article. But in my case, it's the exact same URL and title.
Should I post a new topic?
Sankari Nair
marked this post as
complete
Super excited to share that this feature is now live! A single card now includes both concise and detailed summaries. You can choose your default in settings and toggle between them in the chat tab. You can also save the output to your fully editable notebook. This is all part of a bigger update that includes Chat with Your Content and Augmented Browsing. Check out the launch here: https://www.producthunt.com/posts/recall-augmented-browsing
m
matar3
I created a summary of the article https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00431-024-05767-1. Then, later, i was reading the article on the website, and i clicked on a heading to jump to a subsection of the article, thus the url became https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00431-024-05767-1#additional-information. At this point i wanted to give a look at the Recall summary of the article, so i clicked again on Recall extension to open the generated summary, but it generated a new summary (identical to previous one) since it didn't "understand" it was the same article.
Btw the title of the article was "Phoenix criteria for sepsis: are these enough to guide a clinician?", but Recall used the title "Assessment of clinical outcome of children with sepsis outside the intensive care unit", that is instead the title of another article, suggested in the page with a link since it was an article about similar content viewed by other people.
Sankari Nair
marked this post as
in progress
N
Nicholas Andonakis
Generating a concise and a detailed summary create two seperate entries. They should be filed under one with the option to switch between.
Sankari Nair
Makes sense, thank you remco